Which of the following is NOT an example of a comfort contract statement?

A comfort contract is designed to create a safe and supportive environment for participants in recovery settings. It typically includes statements that emphasize respect, confidentiality, and a focus on constructive dialogue, which helps to foster trust among participants.

The choice regarding requirements for participation in sessions does not fit the definition of a comfort contract statement. Instead, it pertains more to the logistics and rules of how sessions operate, rather than the principles that create a safe space for interaction. Comfort contract statements focus on interpersonal dynamics and the atmosphere of the discussions, such as ensuring respect among participants and maintaining confidentiality.

By emphasizing respect for confidentiality, allowing for on-topic side talk, and prohibiting personal attacks, the comfort contract aims to facilitate open communication and support. Requirements for participation, while important for maintaining an organized and effective session, do not contribute to the emotional safety and mutual respect that comfort contracts seek to ensure. Therefore, this particular choice is not considered an example of a comfort contract statement.